Parks, Open Spaces, Wild Places Reports
Search
•
RSS Feed
Executive Summary
After decades of scientific inquiry, 600 public hearings, and a
record 1.6 million comments from the American public, the Clinton
administration issued the Roadless Area Conservation Rule in January
2001. The Roadless Rule, as it is commonly known, originally protected
58.5 million acres of wild national forest land from most commercial
logging and road-building, and associated mining and drilling. Since
then, the Bush administration has removed these protections from 9.5
million acres of roadless areas in the Tongass National Forest.
For
the remaining 49 million acres of America’s last wild national forests,
the 2001 Roadless Rule ensures that they will continue to provide clean
drinking water for millions of Americans, wildlife habitat, endless
recreational opportunities, and other important values. The rule also
compels the U.S. Forest Service to address the estimated $10.3 billion
backlog in needed maintenance for existing roads, instead of using
taxpayer dollars to build new roads.
The American people have
spoken in favor of protecting roadless areas within our national
forests. Since 2000, Colorado residents have submitted 96,988 comments,
with the overwhelming majority of them in favor of protecting the
state’s 4.4 million acres of roadless forests.
The strong public support for protecting roadless areas can be understood by looking at their economic and ecological values:
Sixty million Americans rely on drinking water from national forests. Roadless areas, because of their pristine condition, provide
some of the purest sources of these essential water supplies. In the
Rocky Mountain Forest Service Region, which includes Colorado, drinking
water is worth $241.5 million annually.
Recreation in national
forests has become more and more popular over time as Americans
participate in activities from bicycling and hiking to fishing and
hunting. In 2006, 1.6 million Colorado residents took part in hunting,
fishing, and wildlife-watching; that same year, wildlife-related
recreation contributed $2.4 billion to the state economy.
Some
of the most unspoiled habitat for threatened, endangered, and declining
species is found in roadless areas. Colorado’s national forests are
home to 21 at-risk species that could be harmed by destruction of
roadless areas.
Despite the many benefits national forests
provide, historically, their value has been measured solely by the
timber products they produce. Through subsidies to the timber industry
and road construction at taxpayers’ expense, the Forest Service has
sold timber from national forest land to timber companies at such a low
price that the agency loses millions of dollars each year.
More
recently, the Bush administration has fought to dismantle the 2001
Roadless Rule and to open these pristine lands to development. This
threatens not only the ecological value of these lands but the revenue
provided by those who participate in recreational activities in our
last wild national forests. For hunters, hikers, and campers alike, the
wild characteristics of these untouched lands are what draw them to our
national forests. The 2001 Roadless Rule ensures that communities that
rely on income from recreation in these last wild national forests will
continue to have it for years to come. After all, national forest
roadless areas belong to all Americans and deserve federal protection.
The
Bush administration’s attack on the Roadless Rule is in keeping with
their other numerous harmful policies, such as the so called “Healthy
Forests” initiative, which increases logging and removes environmental
safeguards under the guise of preventing forest fires.
In the
short term, the timber companies, mining companies, and energy
companies that support the Bush administration’s policies stand to
benefit from attacks on protections for roadless forests, making
millions at taxpayers’ expense. However, it is the long term losses to
the American public that we need to consider.
Roadless areas
are among the nation’s greatest natural assets and their ecological and
economic value is too great to sacrifice. Our last wild national
forests should be protected once and for all.
|