Sign up to get e-mail alerts

New Energy Future News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
6/21/2007
For More Information:
Margaret Hartzell, (919) 833-0015
Anna Aurilio, 202-683-1250 x317
Rob Sargent, 617-747-4317 North Carolina

Energy Bill Unveiled in Committee, Draws Opposition

Raleigh—The state’s investor-owned utilities have left dark fingerprints on the latest version of Senate Bill 3, the long-negotiated energy bill unveiled today in a key Senate Committee.  The bill, now titled, “Promote Renewable Energy/Baseload Generation,” drew opposition from Environment North Carolina and others for provisions that would facilitate new coal and nuclear power plants in the state. 

“North Carolina has a tremendous opportunity to produce clean, renewable energy from the sun and wind, and to use energy more efficiently,” said Environment North Carolina State Director Elizabeth Ouzts.  “We should maximize that potential before tipping the scales further towards more dirty, dangerous power sources.”

More than 60 percent of the state’s electricity today comes from burning fossil fuels, a major source of the pollution that leads to global warming.  Another 30 percent comes from nuclear power, which poses safety risks and creates waste that remains hazardous for generations. 

Senate Bill 3 now contains provisions that would shift financial risks of building new power plants from investors to ratepayers, making massive new coal and nuclear generation facilities in North Carolina all but certain.

Speaking before the committee, Environment North Carolina objected to the provisions, arguing they overshadowed the clean energy portions of the bill, which, by themselves, could represent an important step towards maximizing the state’s potential for clean energy and energy efficiency.

Until today, Senate Bill 3 and House Bill 77, the Clean Energy Act, had closely tracked each other.  Both bills contain provisions that require that at least 7.5% of the state’s energy needs to be met from renewable sources of power, including the sun, wind, and agricultural waste.  Both measures would ensure that more than 50,000 homes by 2021 would be powered by the sun.  Both would require substantial energy savings measures, cutting global warming pollution and creating new clean jobs. 

“We’re disappointed that the clean energy section of Senate Bill 3 is now marred by the black mark of incentives for more nuclear and coal,” said Ouzts.  “We’re asking lawmakers to make the clean energy bill clean again.”