Sign up to get e-mail alerts

Healthy Oceans News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
2008-06-18
For More Information:
Ben Schreiber, 202-683-1250
Michael Gravitz, 202-683-1250 x349
John Rumpler, 617-747-4306 Washington, D.C.

Statement of Anna Aurilio, Environment America's Washington, D.C. Director, on Proposals to Open our Coasts to Offshore Drilling

**Download quotes on drilling here.**

Environment America is firmly opposed to proposals by President Bush, Senator McCain and Congressman Peterson to continue decades of failed energy policy by opening our protected coasts to offshore drilling.  Drilling in these protected areas is not the solution to high oil prices, we need to reduce our dependence on oil.  Instead of opening every last corner of our country to oil drilling, we need to produce cars that go further on a gallon of gasoline, invest in mass transit and other alternatives to driving, and develop clean renewable energy.

President Bush, Senator McCain and Congressman Peterson are ignoring the real potential of clean energy technologies to build our economy and reduce our dependence on oil.  There’s no need to sacrifice our white sandy beaches for more oil industry profits when we have the technology to build cars that go 100 miles per gallon.

According to President Bush’s own Energy Information Administration, drilling in currently protected offshore areas would not significantly affect domestic oil production until 2030 and the impact on prices would be “insignificant.”

Moreover, offshore drilling proposals threaten sensitive coasts, beaches and beloved parks with chronic pollution from oil and gas production and catastrophic spills from platforms and pipelines or tankers and barges that bring oil onshore.  At each stage of testing, exploration, and production, the oil and gas business produces contaminated water, uses toxic drilling muds, and periodically spills oil and toxic liquids into the ocean.  Pollutants like mercury and persistent hydrocarbons contaminate fish and sea life near platforms and massive spills kill seabirds, sea turtles, fish and marine mammals. At stake are Virginia’s Chincoteague Island, Cape Cod National Seashore, Sandy Hook in New Jersey, the Outer Banks of North Carolina, Florida Keys Marine Sanctuary, and Pt. Reyes in California, to name just a few. 

Coastal states with protected beaches benefit from tens of billions of dollars of tourist economy expenditures on everything from hotels, house rentals and meals to fishing tackle and boat rentals.  California has a 1,000 mile coast with 450 beaches and tens of billions of dollars of expenditures and tens of thousands of jobs based on ocean-beach recreation.  Tourists to Florida, many of them drawn to the states beautiful beaches and coastal waters, generated 85 million visits in 2005 creating almost 1 million jobs and generating $57 billion in taxable transactions.

Environment America urges the President and the Congress to reject these wrongheaded proposals and focus on real opportunities to move us towards a clean energy economy.  Making our cars, trucks and buildings more efficient and shifting to clean renewable energy is the smart way to solve our energy crisis. 

Congress should start by passing an extension of tax credits for clean energy sources, plug in hybrids and efficiency. These tax credits are essential for ensuring clean energy solutions like wind, solar and plug-in hybrids make it to the marketplace. We must also make sure that we are going further on a gallon of gasoline. Last year Congress passed the first increase in fuel economy in over 30 years, but we can and should go further. Unfortunately President Bush is shortchanging the American public with a paltry proposal to implement the recently-passed law. We should be achieving 60 miles per gallon by 2025. Congress should also pass a renewable energy standard (RES) that ensures we get 25 % of our electricity from clean renewable sources. We must also increase funding for public transportation and implement a national transportation policy that will reduce costs for consumers and pollution in to the environment. These policies will lower energy costs, reduce our dependence on foreign oil and serve as an important step in the emissions reductions that science says will be necessary to curb global warming.

Any effort to turn more of our energy future over to the oil companies that have created this problem is a foolish retread of past failures. Solving our energy crisis will require a bold new energy policy that reduces our dependence on dirty fuels, increases our use of clean renewable energy and uses energy more efficiently.