Sign up to get e-mail alerts

Global Warming Solutions News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
2007-04-12
For More Information:
Frank Gorke, (617) 747-4316
Emily Figdor, 202-683-1250
Rob Sargent, 617-747-4317 Massachusetts

Massachusetts Bucks Trend; Data Point to Warning Signs in Transportation, Natural Gas Dependency

 

Boston—A new analysis of federal fuel use data has found that emissions of global warming are on the rise across the nation, but have stayed basically flat in Massachusetts between 1990 and 2004. This is the first time that 2004 state-by-state data on carbon dioxide emissions have been released.

The release came on the same day that Congressman Ed Markey and Mayor Tom Menino of Boston hosted a town-hall style meeting on global warming at the newly renovated Boston Children’s Museum. Both men called for local, state, and federal leadership to solve global warming.

“Our trend is better than anyone else’s,” said Frank Gorke, Director of Environment Massachusetts, “in part thanks to the leadership of people like Mayor Menino and Congressman Markey. But we still have a long road ahead of us to get the deep pollution reductions we’ll need – as much as 80% by 2050 – to avoid the worst impacts of global warming. That’s why we’re calling for a strong cap on global warming pollution. A strong cap will make sure we start using the tools in our toolbox today – energy efficiency, renewable fuels – that will cut global warming pollution and get us on the right track. And, a strong cap will drive inventors and investors to develop the next generation of solutions.”

Environment Massachusetts’ report comes less than a week after the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a U.N. body charged with assessing the scientific record on global warming, released its consensus report on the current and projected impacts of global warming.  The report warned of increasing droughts, floods, heat waves, water stress, forest fires, and coastal flooding in the United States but concluded that “many impacts can be avoided, reduced, or delayed” by quickly and significantly reducing global warming pollution.

“Global warming pollution is skyrocketing nationally just as scientists are sounding alarms that we must rapidly reduce pollution to protect future generations.  This report is a wake-up call to cap pollution levels now, and plan for deep reductions soon, before it is too late,” said Gorke.

Using data compiled by the U.S. Department of Energy, Environment Massachusetts’ new report, The Carbon Boom, examines trends in carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption between 1990 and 2004, the most recent year for which state-by-state data are available.

Major findings of the report include:

 

  • *National picture: Nationwide, emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel consumption increased by 18% between 1990 and 2004.  Coal-fired power plants and the transportation sector—especially cars and SUVs—drove this emissions increase.
  • *Emissions levels: Massachusetts’ carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption stayed relatively flat.
  • *Warning signs: A closer look at sector-by-sector emissions levels in the state reveals that Massachusetts’ flat line is largely a result of shifting electricity production from dirtier coal and oil to cleaner natural gas-fired power plants. At the same time, transportation sector emissions rose significantly.
  • *Huge increase in use of natural gas: In Massachusetts, carbon dioxide emissions from natural gas-fired power plants increased by 156% between 1990 and 2004, rising from 3.4 million metric tons to 8.6 million metric tons. 
  • *Big jump in vehicle emissions: In Massachusetts, carbon dioxide emissions from burning gasoline (primarily in cars and SUVs) increased by 19% between 1990 and 2004, rising from 20.6 million metric tons to 24.5 million metric tons.  Over the same period, vehicle miles traveled in Massachusetts also increased by 19%.

“This is a good news/bad news story for Massachusetts,” said Gorke. “The flat line is good news, but it’s not a pure success story. It’s partly through action and partly through accident. For example, a big chunk of the avoided emissions came from building new natural gas plants after deregulating the electricity sector, not because of any specific climate policy. And most people agree we’re already too dependent on natural gas, so we’ve probably maxed out that emissions reduction strategy. And, the rise in vehicle emissions is a significant problem. Moreover, flat is not good enough. We need to have a clear plan to get 80% reductions by the middle of this century – and right now, we’re not on that path at all. We’re going to look to leaders like Mayor Menino and Congressman Markey to put us on the right track.”

Several proposals at the state and federal level would tackle global warming emissions. In Massachusetts, Senators Marc Pacheco and Robert O’Leary have both filed bills to cap global warming pollution. At the federal level, the Safe Climate Act (H.R. 1590), introduced by Representative Henry Waxman (CA) and supported by every member of the Massachusetts delegation in the House, and the Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act (S. 309), introduced by Senators Bernie Sanders (VT) and Barbara Boxer (CA) in the Senate, would limit global warming pollution to levels that current science says are necessary to prevent the worst effects of global warming.  The bills would freeze U.S. global warming emissions in 2010 and reduce emissions by about 15% by 2020 and by 80% by 2050.

###