Stop Toxic Pollution Reports
Search
•
RSS Feed
Executive Summary
Environment America is the new home of U.S. PIRG's environmental work.
Since 1980, the Superfund toxic waste
cleanup program has worked to
protect the one in four Americans,
including more than 10 million children,
who live within four miles of the
nation’s most polluted toxic waste sites.
After 25 years of experience, the
Superfund program has evolved to
protect Americans from toxic chemicals
released when industry collides with
nature, such as hurricanes and floods.
The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) now must use this
experience to face its biggest challenge
yet—cleaning up the toxic pollution left
behind after Hurricane Katrina flooded
the Gulf Coast. Unfortunately, funding
shortfalls plague the Superfund
program and may hinder its ability to
respond to Hurricane Katrina and
address the thousands of other polluted
sites littered across the country.
In the 1970s, parents in Love Canal,
New York, a community built upon a
toxic waste dump, galvanized the nation
when they demanded action from their
elected officials to address the health
problems afflicting local children. In
response, Congress created the
Superfund program in 1980 as the
preeminent cleanup program for the
nation’s most contaminated and toxic
sites. Since its inception, the Superfund
program has performed more than 7,000
emergency removal actions and
permanently cleaned up 294 sites on the
National Priorities List of the most toxic
sites.
Over the years, the Superfund program
has evolved beyond just conducting
cleanups at traditional hazardous waste
sites; the Superfund program now
supports response actions triggered by
terrorism, natural disasters and other
catastrophes. The Superfund program
helped respond to the terrorist attacks
on the World Trade Center, the anthrax
contamination in the U.S. Senate, the
devastating Midwest floods in 1993, and
the initial federal response to Hurricane
Katrina in 2005. In addition, the
Superfund program has functioned as a
safety net in hundreds of lesser-known
situations when hazardous substances
threatened communities after nature
and industry collided. For example:
• The Gurley Pit Superfund site is
situated in the floodplain of 15 Mile
Bayou in northeast Arkansas. When
15 Mile Bayou flooded in 1980, water
surged into Gurley Pit, releasing
500,000 gallons of hazardous waste
onto residences and farmland. The
Superfund program cleaned up the
site and ensured that heavy rainfalls
and flooding will no longer present a
threat to local residents.
• In 1999, Hurricane Floyd dumped
seven inches of rain over a 24-hour
period in southeastern Pennsylvania.
The resulting floodwaters carried toxic
contaminants from an upstream
industrial area into a residential
neighborhood. Using the Superfund
program, EPA identified two old landfills that were leaching a toxic
brew into adjacent waterways. In
2001, EPA began planning long-term
cleanup actions at these two sources to
protect downstream residents.
• In 1997, a severe flood at Milo Creek
washed toxic mining waste from the
Bunker Hill Mine and Metallurgical
Complex in northern Idaho onto 50
homes. The Superfund program
removed the toxic waste from the
homes and is stabilizing the Milo
Creek channel to prevent future floods
from dumping more toxic mining
waste on downstream residents.
Hurricane Katrina presents EPA and the
Superfund program with its biggest
challenge yet – cleaning up after a flood
of epic proportions. Hurricane forces
and floodwaters that hit the heavily
industrialized Gulf Coast in August
2005 created a stew of chemicals,
sewage, oil, and pesticides that
dispersed and settled widely. In the
days and weeks after the hurricane, the
Superfund program helped officials
sample water for toxic chemicals,
contain oil spills, remove barrels
containing hazardous substances, and
collect and dispose of hazardous waste.
The full extent of these toxic releases
will take years to understand and even
longer to clean, but Superfund will
continue to play a pivotal role in making
the area safe again for local residents.
Unfortunately, the Superfund program
must confront the challenge of cleaning
up after Hurricane Katrina—and
addressing thousands of other still contaminated
sites across the country—
with inadequate funding. The “polluter
pays” fees levied on industries and
chemicals that contribute to Superfund
sites expired in 1995, leaving the
program without a dedicated source of
funding. Consequently, financial
reserves in the Superfund trust have
declined from a surplus of $3.8 billion in
1996 to levels that approach or reach
zero at the end of each fiscal year,
forcing average American taxpayers to
shoulder more of the cost for toxic waste
cleanups. In addition, Superfund’s
financial demands have outstripped
federal appropriations, leading to
program funding shortfalls that slow or
stop site cleanups and hinder EPA’s
ability to address the backlog of
contaminated sites.
As a result, the eve of Superfund’s 25th
anniversary comes at a time when the
program faces an uncertain future. To
ensure that polluters, rather than
regular taxpayers, pay to clean up
Superfund sites, the polluter pays fees
must be reinstated. Reinstating these
fees will once again ensure that the
Superfund program receives the
funding it needs to function properly.
In addition, a fully-funded Superfund
program will be able to meet and
overcome future emergencies and
program challenges. In an era of federal
budget deficits and program spending
cuts amounting to billons of dollars,
providing a reliable source of funding
for the Superfund program with the
polluter pays fees is sound public policy
that will do much to protect public
health and the environment.
|