Parks, Open Spaces, Wild Places Reports
Search
•
RSS Feed
Executive Summary
After decades of scientific inquiry, 600 public hearings, and a record
1.6 million comments from the American public, the Clinton
administration issued the Roadless Area Conservation Rule in January
2001. The Roadless Rule, as it is commonly known, originally protected
58.5 million acres of wild national forest land from most commercial
logging and road-building, and associated mining and drilling. Since
then, the Bush administration has removed these protections from 9.5
million acres of roadless areas in the Tongass National Forest.
For
the remaining 49 million acres of America’s last wild national forests,
the 2001 Roadless Rule ensures that they will continue to provide clean
drinking water for millions of Americans, wildlife habitat, endless
recreational opportunities, and other important values. The rule also
compels the U.S. Forest Service to address the estimated $10.3 billion
backlog in needed maintenance for existing roads, instead of using
taxpayer dollars to build new roads.
The American people have
spoken in favor of protecting roadless areas within our national
forests. Since 2000, Washington residents have submitted 146,308
comments, with the overwhelming majority of them in favor of protecting
the state’s two million acres of roadless forests.
The strong
public support for protecting roadless areas can be understood by
looking at their economic and ecological values: Sixty million
Americans rely on drinking water from national forests. Roadless areas,
because of their pristine condition, provide some of the purest sources
of these essential water supplies. In the Pacific Northwest Forest
Service Region, which includes Washington, drinking water is worth
$951.4 million annually.
Recreation in national forests has
become more and more popular over time as Americans participate in
activities from bicycling and hiking to fishing and hunting. In 2006,
2.3 million Washington residents took part in hunting, fishing, and
wildlifewatching; that same year, wildlife-related recreation
contributed $2.7 billion to the state economy.
Some of the most unspoiled habitat for threatened, endangered, and declining species is found in roadless areas.
Washington’s
national forests are home to 14 at-risk species that could be harmed by
destruction of roadless areas. Despite the many benefits national
forests provide, historically, their value has been measured solely by
the timber products they produce. Through subsidies to the timber
industry and road construction at taxpayers’ expense, the Forest
Service has sold timber from national forest land to timber companies
at such a low price that the agency loses millions of dollars each year.
More
recently, the Bush administration has fought to dismantle the 2001
Roadless Rule and to open these pristine lands to development. This
threatens not only the ecological value of these lands but the revenue
provided by those who participate in recreational activities in our
last wild national forests. For hunters, hikers, and campers alike, the
wild characteristics of these untouched lands are what draw them to our
national forests.
The 2001 Roadless Rule ensures that
communities that rely on income from recreation in these last wild
national forests will continue to have it for years to come. After all,
national forest roadless areas belong to all Americans and deserve
federal protection.
The Bush administration’s attack on the
Roadless Rule is in keeping with their othernumerous harmful policies,
such as the socalled “Healthy Forests” initiative, which increases
logging and removes environmental safeguards under the guise of
preventing forest fires.
In the short term, the timber
companies, mining companies, and energy companies that support the Bush
administration’s policies stand to benefit from attacks on protections
for roadless forests, making millions at taxpayers’ expense. However,
it is the long term losses to the American public that we need to
consider. Roadless areas are among the nation’s greatest natural assets
and their ecological and economic value is too great to sacrifice. Our
last wild national forests should be protected once and for all.
|